GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Meta] proposal — a flair for lean mass posts — 24 comments in the full submission. View in context.
194
c/glp1muscle·submitted 3 months ago by u/usp_appendix

[Meta] proposal — a flair for lean mass posts

Questionbranch of 4 comments

Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/progresspics repeats that sarcopenia is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 23 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is true…

Read the full submission and all 24 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 3 months ago
u/viktor_laurent9 points·3 months ago

protein targets in g/kg

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_bergstrom5 points·3 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]4 points·3 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/ahmed_fonseca3 points·3 months ago

[removed by moderator]

Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1muscle

Lean-mass retention during rapid weight loss: protein targets, resistance-training minimums, DEXA and BIA measurement reality, FFMI tracking, and the sarcopenia question that nobody funded a proper trial for.

30kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/glp1muscle rules
  1. Body-composition claims need a method. Bathroom BIA scales are not a method.
  2. Protein targets in g/kg, not "lots".
  3. No supplement selling, no coaching solicitation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.