Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of does dose history actually matter or is it forum lore at this point — 59 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.2k
does dose history actually matter or is it forum lore at this point
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking log against triglycerides for 33 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here. Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one…
Yeah, the consistency is the value.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
the 89 week mark is where it gets interesting
the boring consistency is the point
long-running logs are the value
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
This is correct. Long-term logs matter.
load more comments (2) →
This is correct.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 97.4% on the same vial is normal.