dose history — my 23-week log, condensed into one table
I have had 8 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 14 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 98.4% against a claimed 97.2%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
[deleted]
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
long-running logs are the value
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
dose, date, weight, waist, early fullness, labs
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
dose, date, weight, waist, the food-noise thing, labs
long-running logs are the value
Small correction: the trial was 12 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
update rather than repost, 6 people doing this
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
How many weeks between the two measurements?
the 3 month update is the real test
the people still updating at week 45 are the reward
one log per person, update it, do not repost
one log per person, update it, do not repost
Adding to this: weekly update is doing more work than the comment implies.
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
long-running logs are the value
long-running logs are the value
Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Sceptical.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 84 weeks to accept.
the people still updating at week 38 are the reward
- 1Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.7 comments in this branch · started by u/formulary_fighter
- 2Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next…7 comments in this branch · started by u/throwaway_titration