[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on COA
related substances. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle cramps, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort related substances out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 11 months. My triglycerides was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the batch number or it did not happen
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Water content on the document?
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 77 weeks to accept.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
post the whole document, not the headline number
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
chromatogram or it did not happen
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
- 1the batch number or it did not happen9 comments in this branch · started by u/certified_reference