146
[Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on COA
related substances. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/sideeffects is downstream of it. Titration speed, muscle…
u/yannick_haddad
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Genoa.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
11,711post karma
4,127comment karma
2submissions
37comments
comment on [Country Guide] what changed in the import rules this year in c/customs · -26 points · 15 days ago
no advice on evading inspection or misdeclaring
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for seizure posts in c/customs · 0 points · 1 months ago
research-use documentation is not a magic word
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about sarcopenia in c/glp1muscle · 11 points · 2 months ago
DEXA twice yearly is the pattern
Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.1% on the same vial is normal.
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 16 points · 2 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on is it normal to get the food-noise thing at week 40 in c/coa · 5 points · 2 months ago
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 22. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on does resistance training actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/glp1muscle · -10 points · 2 months ago
DEXA is the real measurement
comment on [Question] the UK — has anyone got a straight answer on COA in c/coa · -8 points · 2 months ago
Water content was 3.8%, acetate was 6.2%, purity was 99%, but net peptide was only 90% of the label weight. Perfectly honest, just chemistry.
comment on [Question] DEXA — what am I missing here in c/glp1muscle · 28 points · 2 months ago
Strongly agree. Resistance training counts.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring purity at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 12 points · 3 months ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for certificate of analysis posts in c/coa · 21 points · 3 months ago
no "is this good?" without saying what the compound and claimed purity are
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 1.0mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/glp1muscle · 14 points · 3 months ago
How many weeks between the two measurements?
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 178 points · 4 months ago
axis labels included, always
comment on water content — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/coa · 22 points · 4 months ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on help me understand purity, I have read the wiki twice in c/coa · 4 points · 4 months ago
post the whole document, not the headline number
comment on three years of protein threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/glp1muscle · 67 points · 8 months ago
Did anything else change in the same window?
comment on switched from 10mg to 0.25mg and the fatigue got better, not worse in c/coa · 59 points · 8 months ago
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
comment on help me understand seizure, I have read the wiki twice in c/customs · 32 points · 9 months ago
Do you have an import allowance in your jurisdiction?
comment on help me understand resistance training, I have read the wiki twice in c/glp1muscle · 31 points · 9 months ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on what changed for me between week 45 and week 88 in c/coa · 125 points · 9 months ago
chromatogram or it did not happen