933
stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 10mg, week 26, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable —…
u/tired_ledger_notes
Here for the tables, not the takes.
member · joined 16 Jul 2026
6,355post karma
4,080comment karma
3submissions
71comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on does CGM actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/t2dglp1 · 38 points · 1 year ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on stalled for 2 weeks at 1.7mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/scamalerts · 43 points · 1 year ago
PDF metadata said the COA was created in a browser four months after the date printed on the page. Worth flagging.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across Medutest and Janoshik — 96.2% and 99.2% in c/retatrutide · 18 points · 1 year ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on metformin — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/t2dglp1 · 24 points · 1 year ago
A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin
comment on metformin — 5 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/t2dglp1 · 19 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on Germany: exit scam, and what it actually costs here in c/scamalerts · 75 points · 1 year ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on why does nobody talk about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 504 points · 1 year ago
Dose escalation on retatrutide is steeper and faster than on semaglutide. Do not assume the titration patterns transfer.
comment on 14 months in and fake COA is still the thing I get wrong in c/scamalerts · 36 points · 1 year ago
the FGP situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on help me understand research peptides, I have read the wiki twice in c/researchpeptides · 77 points · 1 year ago
focus on identity verification, handling, evidence state
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on metformin in c/t2dglp1 · 44 points · 1 year ago
hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with A1c
comment on someone explain glucagon to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/retatrutide · 14 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 16 weeks, not 39. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify cloned site in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 1 year ago
the HJ situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 85 in c/retatrutide · 0 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on is it normal to get nausea at week 85 in c/retatrutide · 34 points · 1 year ago
the dosing is steep, the constipation reports are real, and nobody knows the human safety yet
Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on three years of fake COA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 24 points · 1 year ago
The cloned SWB store used our old homepage image from 2023. Reverse image search caught it in 6 seconds.
comment on dose escalation: what the trials say vs what this community says in c/retatrutide · 10 points · 1 year ago
nobody should be giving this to anyone without extensive monitoring
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 10mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
comment on dose escalation: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/retatrutide · 101 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
comment on why does nobody talk about secretagogue in c/researchpeptides · 77 points · 1 year ago
not approved for human use, full stop