[Question] how do you actually verify cloned site
Right, the scam question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 14 data points over 14 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 30, not week 79. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
the HJ situation resolved, logged it here as resolved
I am going to push back on this slightly.
Dated screenshot or is this from memory?
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
Strongly agree. The dispute resolved and the record stayed updated.
The GGPeps exit scam collected 13 orders and disappeared. Order ids 33 through 13 all silent.
Batch 15 appeared on CPC, SWB, and CPC claims it is raw material origin. Could be fine, could be reseller. Logged it in the directory.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
- 1The GGPeps exit scam collected 13 orders and disappeared. Order ids 33…5 comments in this branch · started by u/blunt_coldbox_notes
- 2Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.4 comments in this branch · started by u/scam_taxonomy