u/thandi_solberg
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Groningen.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Comments — page 2 of 3
comment on [Lab] 23th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/t2dglp1 · 12 points · 10 months ago
post A1c with units and assay date
comment on [PSA] glycaemic control is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/t2dglp1 · 7 points · 11 months ago
metformin combo is standard
comment on stalled for 18 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/labresults · 1 points · 1 year ago
inter-lab variance is real, 24 points is inside normal
comment on [Lab] 7th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/labresults · 6 points · 1 year ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
comment on [Discussion] the CGM advice in here is 18 years out of date in c/t2dglp1 · 13 points · 1 year ago
the TSH change is the signal
comment on genuine question about regulatory that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 1 year ago
handlers in the community are rare and cautious
comment on genuine question about regulatory that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/bpc157 · 2 points · 1 year ago
regulatory status changed in 15 countries, check yours
comment on regulatory is the most under-discussed thing in c/vendorvetting in c/bpc157 · 0 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on stalled for 7 weeks at 0.25mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/t2dglp1 · 371 points · 1 year ago
the A1c change is the signal
comment on [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bpc157 · 45 points · 1 year ago
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
comment on failure — my 14-week log, condensed into one table in c/darkspot · 5 points · 1 year ago
money lost to group buys
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #21 — France, 39 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/labresults · 52 points · 1 year ago
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
comment on metformin: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 0 points · 1 year ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
comment on metformin: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · -33 points · 1 year ago
Ireland here. Waited 16 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.
comment on metformin: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/t2dglp1 · 119 points · 1 year ago
What are you comparing it against though?
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for BPC-157 posts in c/bpc157 · 71 points · 2 years ago
This is correct. The naming is genuinely confusing.
comment on week 71 check-in — 7kg down, reflux manageable, one thing confusing me in c/bpc157 · 1 points · 2 years ago
the sequence variation is the real issue
comment on [Meta] the below spec rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/labresults · 47 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, the PeptideMeter number matching the claim is the actual signal.
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/labresults · 100 points · 2 years ago
the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/labresults · 269 points · 2 years ago
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?