[Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom.
I have been tracking test results against triglycerides for 35 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation is weaker than I expected, which is itself mildly interesting given how confidently people link the two in here.
Caveats up front: one person, one lab, one assay, no control, and I changed my training in the middle of it, which was stupid.
tl;dr: probably real, definitely smaller than the threads imply, and not worth reorganising your week around.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Tested 2 batches from QST over 5 weeks. Spread was 95.1% to 94.2, mostly 95.1. Consistent vendor.
Slight fix: the number was 97.4, not 97.2. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
Not to be pedantic but below spec and purity are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result
Which Medutest service and what method did they use?
This result fits the template perfectly. Logged.
Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?
Tested 2 batches from WXT over 15 weeks. Spread was 97.2% to 97.4, mostly 97.2. Consistent vendor.
the 98.1% result confirmed the vendor claim, that is the signal
- 1Tested 2 batches from QST over 5 weeks. Spread was 95.1% to 94.2, mostly…7 comments in this branch · started by u/diego_szabo