u/teodor_lokken
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Coimbra.
member · joined 14 May 2025
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 36 points · 1 year ago
Water content on the document? That affects your concentration math.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 43 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on [Results] 96 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/coa · 90 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to Medutest and PeptideMeter. 98.3% and 98.4%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 193 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
comment on three years of certificate of analysis threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 21 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
comment on CagriSema vs REDEFINE — genuinely asking which matters more in c/cagrilintide · 277 points · 1 year ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 25 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on week 11 check-in — 47kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 23 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring reship at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/vendorvetting · 372 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on reship — my 22-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 63 points · 1 year ago
the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
comment on tapering vs regain — genuinely asking which matters more in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
cite the discontinuation data rather than guessing regain rates
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify regain in c/tapering · 20 points · 1 year ago
What was the batch number and which service?
comment on the COA question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/coa · 12 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 207 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · -27 points · 1 year ago
What is the method line say? Not the technique, the actual method.
comment on [Meta] the PeptideMeter rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/vendorvetting · 8 points · 1 year ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 33 points · 1 year ago
the mechanism is different, the side effect profile reflects it
comment on tried CagriSema for 12 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cagrilintide · 37 points · 1 year ago
comment on anyone else notice area percent kicking in around week 25 in c/coa · 573 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to PeptideMeter and VendorInvestigate. 96.8% and 94.2%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
comment on help me understand appetite return, I have read the wiki twice in c/tapering · 3 points · 1 year ago
STEP 1 and SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arms show regain