u/sofia_ferreira
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Rosario.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on [Discussion] the vendor advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Discussion] the vendor advice in here is 9 years out of date in c/vendorvetting · 19 points · 1 year ago
Ordered from JEEP, got the vial, tested it myself via PeptideMeter, and it held the claim. Order fulfilled.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify external review in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 1 year ago
step therapy documentation is the weapon, use it
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 16 points · 1 year ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is glucagon. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify external review in c/insurancefights · 7 points · 1 year ago
Crossposting this to c/coldchain because the people who need it are not reading this community.
comment on [Lab] SGN tirz — VendorInvestigate came back 93.7% against a claimed 94.2% in c/vendorvetting · 71 points · 1 year ago
Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was SSA.
comment on biopsy: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/survodutide · -38 points · 1 year ago
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 13 points · 1 year ago
comment on does FLOW actually matter or is it forum lore at this point in c/trialwatch · 11 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on am I the only one who found formulary harder than the injections in c/insurancefights · 17 points · 1 year ago
formulary exclusions are negotiable sometimes
comment on [Meta] the sequence rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/bpc157 · 42 points · 1 year ago
the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
comment on [Results] 52 weeks, 25kg, and dual agonist was the hard part in c/survodutide · 8 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but glucagon and MASH are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 48 points · 1 year ago
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
comment on genuine question about purity that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/coa · 28 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
comment on [Question] Medutest — what am I missing here in c/vendorvetting · 697 points · 1 year ago
SGN order #3, the UK, no drama, receipts inside
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 113 points · 1 year ago
the counterion is part of the mass you paid for
comment on stalled for 23 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/coa · 459 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Mass% and area% are answering different questions on the same document.
comment on am I the only one who found SELECT harder than the injections in c/trialwatch · 84 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
comment on why does nobody talk about related substances in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
area% is not mass%, and here is exactly why it matters
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 88 weeks to accept.
comment on [Meta] the PeptideMeter rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/vendorvetting · 12 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.