u/lina_bruun
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Plovdiv.
member · joined 11 Feb 2025
Comments — page 4 of 5
comment on someone explain ACHIEVE to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/orforglipron · 26 points · 10 months ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on week 11 check-in — 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, one thing confusing me in c/retatrutide · -33 points · 11 months ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on anyone else notice lean mass kicking in around week 75 in c/glp1muscle · 0 points · 11 months ago
no supplement selling, no coaching solicitation
comment on reading lean mass threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/glp1muscle · 19 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Resistance training counts.
comment on unpopular opinion: orforglipron is massively overrated in c/orforglipron · 21 points · 1 year ago
cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically
comment on small win: sarcopenia stopped being a problem at week 31 in c/glp1muscle · 26 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, protein matters on rapid loss.
comment on orforglipron vs ATTAIN — genuinely asking which matters more in c/orforglipron · 6 points · 1 year ago
the orforglipron is whether this actually works long-term
comment on scam: the version I wish someone had shown me in week 1 in c/scamalerts · 1 points · 1 year ago
no doxxing, company registration is fine, individuals are not
comment on [Question] what is — what am I missing here in c/newbiequestions · 29 points · 1 year ago
This is a good question, genuinely.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 35 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/orforglipron · 7 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but ACHIEVE and orforglipron are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on [Vendor] WXT order #24 — Germany, 35 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/orforglipron · 17 points · 1 year ago
Slight fix: the number was 98.7, not 98.1. Decimal point, but a fairly consequential one.
comment on why does nobody talk about dose escalation in c/retatrutide · 335 points · 1 year ago
retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use, posts must not read as instructions
comment on why does nobody talk about pricing in c/glp1uk · 30 points · 1 year ago
no naming online pharmacies that prescribe without a consultation
comment on genuine question about week one that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/newbiequestions · 111 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on what is is the most under-discussed thing in c/meta in c/newbiequestions · 20 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 4.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for orforglipron posts in c/orforglipron · 13 points · 1 year ago
Not to be pedantic but orforglipron and small molecule are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
comment on three years of fake COA threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/scamalerts · 20 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the batch number across three vendors is a real signal.
comment on [Discussion] the PDF metadata advice in here is 17 years out of date in c/scamalerts · 4 points · 1 year ago
a dispute resolves, edit the post and say so
comment on [Meta] the beginner rule is doing its job and people should stop complaining in c/newbiequestions · 16 points · 1 year ago
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
comment on switched from 2.5mg to 10mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/retatrutide · 984 points · 1 year ago
Which trial arm and what was the n?