genuine question about week one that I am slightly embarrassed to ask
Right, the week one question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 22 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 7, not week 56. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
what is bac water — bacteriostatic water, preservative included
what is a COA — certificate of analysis, document from the lab
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
no question too basic, read the wiki first, then ask anyway
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
Yeah, that is totally normal for week 2.
no dose recommendations for individuals, even here
rudeness is removed faster than bad questions
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
what is titration — it means going slow on the escalation
the beginner question is not dumb
pens versus vials, same molecule, different price
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Not to be pedantic but beginner and normal are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.
Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with first time, not with what you concluded.
link the wiki instead of retyping, but politely
This is a good question, genuinely.
week two nothing happening — yes, that is normal
What does the wiki say?
the first time question is not dumb
- 1the beginner question is not dumb14 comments in this branch · started by u/escrow_evangelist
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…5 comments in this branch · started by u/lina_bruun