795
[Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for
Long-ish post, sorry. tl;dr at the bottom. I have been tracking chargeback against triglycerides for 13 weeks because I could not find anyone who had. The correlation…
u/kaia_cabrera
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Konya.
member · joined 13 Apr 2025
9,710post karma
9,888comment karma
5submissions
105comments
Overview — page 4 of 5
comment on reading chargeback threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/cryptopay · 22 points · 1 year ago
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
comment on the confirmations question that gets asked weekly, answered properly in c/cryptopay · 130 points · 1 year ago
escrow for group buys is standard, use it
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for survodutide posts in c/survodutide · 1 points · 1 year ago
I am going to push back on this slightly.
comment on [Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 1 year ago
no group-buy recruitment, discussing how they fail is fine
comment on [Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cryptopay · 2 points · 1 year ago
the 16% discount versus 27% network fees
comment on [Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cryptopay · 18 points · 1 year ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.
comment on [Discussion] chargeback is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/cryptopay · 31 points · 1 year ago
the 23% discount versus 24% network fees
comment on [Lab] 4th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/trialwatch · 18 points · 1 year ago
Phase 2 TRIUMPH looked amazing. Phase 3 trials are harder. Do not anchor on phase 2 readouts.
comment on France: survodutide, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 123 points · 1 year ago
the safety profile is not just tirzepatide amplified
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on metformin in c/t2dglp1 · 97 points · 1 year ago
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
comment on PeptideMeter — my 17-week log, condensed into one table in c/vendorvetting · 200 points · 1 year ago
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
comment on the SELECT thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/trialwatch · 529 points · 1 year ago
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 32 points · 1 year ago
The VendorInvestigate and Janoshik numbers on the same vial from TFC came back 97.4% and 98.3%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 363 points · 1 year ago
independent test or vendor COA, which is it
comment on small win: GIP stopped being a problem at week 41 in c/tirzepatide · 85 points · 1 year ago
Did you stay on semaglutide or switch? The outcome is different if you are comparing.
comment on anyone else notice SURPASS kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 375 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on why does nobody talk about Mounjaro in c/tirzepatide · 5 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on why does nobody talk about Mounjaro in c/tirzepatide · 84 points · 1 year ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
comment on tried USDC for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · 18 points · 1 year ago
gas versus discount arithmetic is real