0
[Question] how do you actually verify biopsy
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 1.0mg to 15mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 10 weeks…
u/diego_szabo
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Brno.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
2,289post karma
2,541comment karma
3submissions
33comments
Overview — page 2 of 2
comment on Denmark: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 56 points · 9 months ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on why does nobody talk about biopsy in c/survodutide · 251 points · 1 year ago
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
comment on tried interval stretching for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
comment on tried interval stretching for 5 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Discontinuation data is real.
comment on three years of biopsy threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/survodutide · -23 points · 1 year ago
Hepatic fat or MASH or what?
comment on tried interval stretching for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/tapering · 79 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on Germany: dual agonist, and what it actually costs here in c/survodutide · 4 points · 1 year ago
glucagon injection is a different vector than GLP-1
comment on switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the early fullness got better, not worse in c/labresults · 372 points · 1 year ago
ERP claimed 93.7%, Medutest came back 99.2%. 10 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on [Results] 87 weeks, 36kg, and interval stretching was the hard part in c/tapering · 1 points · 1 year ago
tapering instructions are not welcome here
comment on [Discussion] the Medutest advice in here is 8 years out of date in c/labresults · -6 points · 1 year ago
QYB claimed 97.2%, PeptideMeter came back 98.7%. 24 points is inter-lab variance, no drama.
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 15 points · 2 years ago
hepatic fat and survodutide are the story
comment on genuine question about glucagon that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/survodutide · 25 points · 2 years ago
rodent MASH is investigation only
comment on [Results] 91 weeks on 0.25mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/labresults · 275 points · 2 years ago
sample of one, say so
comment on [Discussion] the PeptideMeter advice in here is 13 years out of date in c/labresults · 542 points · 2 years ago
Tested 2 batches from QST over 5 weeks. Spread was 95.1% to 94.2, mostly 95.1. Consistent vendor.
comment on tried test results for 18 weeks. here is what happened. in c/labresults · 0 points · 2 years ago
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts