GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 66 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me — 37 comments in the full submission. View in context.
6.3k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/purity_pedant

week 66 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me

Vendorbranch of 5 comments

Confession thread, sort of. I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 4 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway. So now I have reflux I did…

Read the full submission and all 37 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 2 years ago
u/search_before_post428 points·2 years ago

WXT three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 97.4% anyway, so no harm done.

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida105 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ignacio_silva53 points·2 years ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain15 points·2 years ago

Yeah, BCH took 4 days and the material was flawless. Both of those things are true.

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.