Janoshik vs order records — genuinely asking which matters more
Genuinely asking, not being difficult. Everyone in c/maintenancephase repeats that order records is important. I believe it, but I have never seen anyone show why, and when I search I get 11 threads of people agreeing with each other. Is there a paper? Is there a measurement? Or is this one of those things that is…
Every time this gets posted it hits the front page and every time someone has to re-explain it.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Small correction: the trial was 15 weeks, not 34. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
the batch number or it did not happen
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
WXT three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 98.3% anyway, so no harm done.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard