Skip to content

Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Question] Medutest — what am I missing here — 26 comments in the full submission. View in context.

7.3k

c/vendorvetting·submitted 1 year ago by u/dario_petrescu

[Question] Medutest — what am I missing here

Questionbranch of 5 comments

Quick one. Canada here. reship works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US. Specifics: the route I used took 6 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the…

Read the full submission and all 26 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 1 year ago

u/ledger_modmod · vetting159 points·1 year ago

Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.

replysharereportpermalink

[deleted]106 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink

u/step_count_stan155 points·1 year ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink

u/ignacio_silva47 points·1 year ago

the batch number or it did not happen

replysharereportpermalink

u/arne_nyberg37 points·1 year ago

Order date, product, and result, in that order please?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers

130submissions

Aug 2023created

submissions / month, last year

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com

More in c/vendorvetting

111 months in and testing is still the thing I get wrong14k points · 26 comments
2[Lab] 20th independent test on QSC, and the trend is the interesting part13k points · 44 comments
3Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right11k points · 58 comments
4[Meta] proposal — a flair for vendor posts11k points · 67 comments
5switched from 1.0mg to 0.5mg and the reflux got better, not worse10k points · 39 comments
6small win: testing stopped being a problem at week 659.1k points · 15 comments

c/vendorvetting rules

One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.

Full rules and how they are enforced →

Moderators

u/ledger_mod u/receipts_or_nothing u/paper_trail_paula u/batch_number_bertie u/janoshik_junkie

Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.

Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →