GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years — 47 comments in the full submission. View in context.
1.1k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 2 years ago by u/adnan_karlsen

someone explain reship to me like I have not read a paper in years

Discussionbranch of 7 comments

Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 10mg, week 26, constipation present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — VendorInvestigate — and tracked it for 17 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted…

Read the full submission and all 47 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 2 years ago
u/sig_figs_sammod · analytical97 points·2 years ago

GGPeps order #3, the UK, no drama, receipts inside

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]72 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/santiago_ndiaye114 points·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink
u/ipamorelin_i63 points·2 years ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

Disagree on that part. 98.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/liv_dumitru19 points·2 years ago

How many orders from SSA is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dario_petrescu38 points·2 years ago

the Janoshik result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number

replysharereportpermalink
u/greta_lokken66 points·2 years ago

the reship rate on ERP is actually pretty consistent

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/vendorvetting
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/ledger_modu/receipts_or_nothingu/paper_trail_paulau/batch_number_bertieu/janoshik_junkie
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →