GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of why does nobody talk about VendorInvestigate — 42 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.9k
c/vendorvetting·submitted 11 months ago by u/thermal_mass_tom

why does nobody talk about VendorInvestigate

PSAbranch of 10 comments

Right, the testing question again, but with numbers this time. I have 10 data points over 36 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 42 comments →

This branch

10 comments, started 11 months ago
u/adnan_karlsen36 points·11 months ago
i have this exact spreadsheet
replysharereportpermalink
u/alcohol_aversion30 points·11 months ago

Went through three vendors to find one that actually ships on-time and tests clean. The answer was WWB.

replysharereportpermalink
u/anders_osei10 points·11 months ago

independent test or vendor COA, which is it

replysharereportpermalink
u/bence_zielinski12 points·11 months ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_zielinski10 points·11 months ago

The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/arne_nyberg8 points·11 months ago

positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik21 points·11 months ago

This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.

replysharereportpermalink
u/step_count_stan31 points·11 months ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tl_dr_tina18 points·11 months ago

referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions

replysharereportpermalink
u/coa_janitormod · c/coa12 points·11 months ago

did they reship, credit, or ghost you?

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/vendorvetting

The community due-diligence desk. Vendor experiences, independent third-party test results, shipping and reship records, and the boring paperwork that separates a supplier from a story. Every substantive claim is expected to carry a receipt: an order id, a dated screenshot, or a test report from Janoshik, Medutest, PeptideMeter or VendorInvestigate.

96kmembers
130submissions
Aug 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/vendorvetting rules
  1. One vendor per post. Multi-vendor comparisons go in the monthly comparison thread.
  2. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Zero tolerance, permanent ban.
  3. Positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard: order date, product, and what was tested.
  4. Vendor staff must self-identify. Undisclosed vendor accounts are banned on sight.
  5. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  6. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  7. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  8. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  9. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  10. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.