[Discussion] we are measuring Janoshik at the wrong time and calling it noise
I have had 10 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe.
Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied by about 8 days on nominally the same lane, which matters more in summer than in February.
The independent number came back 93.7% against a claimed 98.6%, which I read as agreement rather than a discrepancy — inter-lab variance on this assay is a point or two either way and treating one lab as ground truth is how people end up in pointless arguments with vendors.
Batch number is in the comments. Ask if you want the method.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
Sceptical.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Homopeptide order #2, Poland, no drama, receipts inside
The VendorInvestigate and Janoshik numbers on the same vial from TFC came back 97.4% and 96.2%. Both are right, inter-lab variance is real.
Is that a PeptideMeter result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe, same result.
How many orders from SWB is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
First order from CPC was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
First order from BCH was great, second one had a different batch and tested lower. The vendor retested and credited me. Logged it here.
WWB order #23, Sweden, no drama, receipts inside
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
positive and negative reports both need the same evidence standard
SWB order #9, New Zealand, no drama, receipts inside
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Is that a Janoshik result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
- 1This order history matches mine almost exactly. Same vendor, same timeframe,…11 comments in this branch · started by u/matias_falk
- 2Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do…6 comments in this branch · started by u/reads_the_wiki