the FLOW question that gets asked weekly, answered properly
STEP. That is the whole post, but I will justify it.
Everything else people worry about in c/orforglipron is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort STEP out first, and almost nobody does.
I say this having got it wrong for 14 months. My eGFR was the thing that eventually made me pay attention, which is a stupid way to learn a lesson that was in the sidebar the whole time.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Disagree on that part. 96.8% and 96.2% on the same vial is normal.
Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.
Disagree on that part. 93.7% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body
SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a chronic disease treatment, not a failure.
phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
What was the dropout rate?
the discontinuation arms are the interesting part, not the STEP endpoints
- 1SURMOUNT-4 discontinuation arm showed regain. That is the reality of a…5 comments in this branch · started by u/hugo_bergstrom
- 2Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.4 comments in this branch · started by u/anders_karlsen