GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of genuine question about hazard ratio that I am slightly embarrassed to ask — 41 comments in the full submission. View in context.
904
c/trialwatch·submitted 6 months ago by u/tove_ogunleye

genuine question about hazard ratio that I am slightly embarrassed to ask

Readoutbranch of 5 comments

FLOW. That is the whole post, but I will justify it. Everything else people worry about in c/coa is downstream of it. Titration speed, early fullness, the endless dose arguments — most of it resolves if you sort FLOW out first, and almost nobody does. I say this having got it wrong for 10 months. My A1c was the thing…

Read the full submission and all 41 comments →

This branch

5 comments, started 6 months ago
u/hazard_ratio_halstats26 points·6 months ago

Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.

replysharereportpermalink
u/tomas_kimani9 points·6 months ago

Yeah, absolute numbers matter more than the press release.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]10 points·6 months ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/renal_outcomes_rnephro-curious12 points·6 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/curious_panel_only4 points·6 months ago

phase 2 is not phase 3, smaller n and shorter trial

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/trialwatch

Clinical trial reading group. New readouts, protocol amendments, endpoint definitions, dropout handling, and the difference between a press release and a publication. Absolute risk reduction and number-needed-to-treat are house dialect here.

34kmembers
95submissions
Nov 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/trialwatch rules
  1. Press-release-only posts must be flaired Press Release until a publication exists.
  2. Give the trial name, phase, n, and primary endpoint in the body.
  3. Relative risk reduction alone is not a result. Show the absolute numbers.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.