[Results] 27 weeks, 41kg, and endpoint was the hard part
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: FLOW matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 13 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 39 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
absolute risk reduction, not relative risk reduction, that is how you decide
What was the dropout rate?
event rates are more informative than hazard ratios alone
What was the dropout rate?
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
Strongly agree. Phase 2 is investigational, not conclusive.
This is correct. Discontinuation arms show the regain reality.
STEP 1 readout: 97.6% mean weight loss, absolute numbers matter. Spread around that mean is enormous.
- 1Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.7 comments in this branch · started by u/trialwatch_theo