dual agonist: what the trials say vs what this community says
Right, the Mounjaro question again, but with numbers this time.
I have 12 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.
The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 23, not week 72. People give up long before the interesting part.
Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
SURMOUNT data is messier than STEP data but the weight loss is there
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
the dual agonism hits different and that is why people describe it differently
This matches the trial data. SURMOUNT-1 was 98.3% body weight at 24 weeks.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
Strongly agree. Tirz is better than sema is not a claim without a comparator dose.
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
do not crack the pen, we have been over this
You have restated the marketing copy. What is the actual substance here.
- 1Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.8 comments in this branch · started by u/titration_marshal