[PSA] Medutest results are area% by default and people keep forgetting
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 5mg to 1.7mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 13 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have muscle cramps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 41 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
the early fullness from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
the early fullness from tirz is different, not necessarily worse
Disagree on that part. 99.3% and 93.7% on the same vial is normal.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
do not crack the pen, we have been over this
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes Disagree on that part.
Adding to this: SURPASS is doing more work than the comment implies.
Small correction: the trial was 2 weeks, not 33. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
week 16 on Mounjaro and the appetite profile is genuinely different from sema
the 15mg is the top of the pen, not the required dose
Hard agree. The food noise disappears differently on the two compounds.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
the appetite change on tirz is more than just reduced hunger, it is different machinery
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
Zepbound and Mounjaro are literally the same drug, the name is the only difference
Did the the food-noise thing feel the same as on tirz or genuinely different?
Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply scaled versions.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
[deleted]
stalled on sema, tried tirz, and the curves were actually different shapes
- 1the early fullness from tirz is different, not necessarily worse12 comments in this branch · started by u/graph_it_gary
- 2Cosigning. The GIP contribution is real and the side effects are not simply…4 comments in this branch · started by u/sten_palacios