tried hypoglycaemia for 23 weeks. here is what happened.
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles.
The claim: CGM matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 16 months without either producing anything.
What would actually settle it is 21 people measuring the same thing the same way. I have started; my numbers are below. They lean one way but not strongly enough for me to declare victory.
If you have data, post the data. If you have an opinion, flair it as an opinion.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Came off after 38 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
the hs-CRP change is the signal
hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with CGM
hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with CGM
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 33 weeks to accept.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
the ApoB change is the signal
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
- 1the hs-CRP change is the signal7 comments in this branch · started by u/sanne_laurent