my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether T2D is why
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: CGM matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 5 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 31 people measuring the same thing…
type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect
No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 49 weeks to accept.
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
the 47 A1c trend is the answer
Second this question. I have wondered about T2D for 10 months and never seen a straight answer.
post A1c with units and assay date
post A1c with units and assay date
Adding to this: A1c is doing more work than the comment implies.
That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.
metformin combo is standard
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 89 weeks to accept.