GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.5k
c/t2dglp1·posted 2 years ago by u/sten_palacios

[Results] 6 weeks on 0.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring

Results Sourced ×6 Receipts ×2

Week 24 update. 40kg down from the start, muscle cramps basically gone since about week 64.

Things that worked: consistency, protein at breakfast, walking more than I want to. Things that did not: everything I bought on the internet to help with muscle cramps.

The part that surprised me is how much of this is admin. Ordering, storing, logging, remembering. Nobody mentions that the hard bit is not the drug, it is the routine.

Happy to answer anything. Please do not ask me what dose you should be on.

2,077 up / 605 down77% upvoted45 commentsid 1rqrn26 Jul 2024

45 comments

25 in this archive, depth 5

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/tomas_lokken77 points·2 years ago

What are you comparing it against though?

replysharereportpermalink
u/graph_it_gary75 points·2 years ago

Week 90 for me and the honest summary is: 31kg down, muscle cramps manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_dziedzic89 points·2 years ago

glycaemic control first, that is the original indication

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]40 points·2 years ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/nora_ramos26 points·2 years ago

type 2 is the indication, weight loss is the side effect

replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_batista8 points·2 years ago

metformin combo is standard

replysharereportpermalink
u/neha_falk24 points·2 years ago

Strongly agree. A1c matters as much as weight.

replysharereportpermalink
u/adnan_karlsen26 points·2 years ago

Yeah, glycaemic control is the original use.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros52 points·2 years ago

the A1c change is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/sten_palaciosOP0 points·2 years ago

Came off after 68 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marisol_moreau1 point·2 years ago·edited

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/emil_okwuosa51 points·2 years ago

CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not

replysharereportpermalink
u/stubborn_batchlist_maybe22 points·2 years ago

No. This is the kind of confident post that gets copied into a screenshot and repeated for years. Where is the evidence.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rania_marchand18 points·2 years ago

CGM traces tell a story, numbers alone do not

replysharereportpermalink
u/a1c_arcMOD35 points·2 years ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_sandvik23 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Hypo risk is real.

replysharereportpermalink
u/iman_castellanos0 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Hypo risk is real.

replysharereportpermalink
u/bianca_dziedzic1 point·2 years ago

Did anything else change in the same window?

replysharereportpermalink
u/a1c_arcT2D16 points·2 years ago

Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.

replysharereportpermalink
u/meal_prep_mira5 points·2 years ago

This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.

replysharereportpermalink
u/stubborn_batchlist_maybe3 points·2 years ago

A1c, CGM, stacking with metformin

replysharereportpermalink
u/zaid_dahlberg1 point·2 years ago

the ApoB change is the signal

replysharereportpermalink
u/wanjiru_osei9 points·2 years ago

How many weeks between the two measurements?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sten_palaciosOP12 points·2 years ago

post A1c with units and assay date

replysharereportpermalink
u/kaia_cabrera5 points·2 years ago·edited

hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with A1c

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/t2dglp1

Type 2 diabetes as the original indication: A1c trajectories, CGM traces, hypoglycaemia risk when stacked with sulfonylureas or insulin, metformin combinations, and why the weight-loss conversation sometimes drowns out the glycaemic one.

36kmembers
62submissions
Jun 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/t2dglp1 rules
  1. Insulin and sulfonylurea interactions are a real hypo risk. Do not hand-wave them.
  2. Post A1c with units and the assay date.
  3. No medication-stopping advice. Ever.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.