22 months in and triple agonist is still the thing I get wrong
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: glucagon matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 23 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 31 people measuring the same…
The practical rule people converge on is 28 days at fridge temperature after first puncture, and that comes from the preservative, not the peptide.
Did you actually measure heart rate or is that a feeling?
TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
research use only, handling and analysis, not protocols
Adding to this: dose escalation is doing more work than the comment implies.
Strongly agree. Heart rate escalation needs the actual data, not impressions.
the 15mg arm is different from 12.5mg, results do not transfer