[Question] triple agonist — what am I missing here
Been lurking in c/sideeffects for about 7 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 42, 15mg, and triple agonist is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 19 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 48.
best — the order this archive was captured in
TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.3% weight loss but the nausea profile on the highest arm was rough. Phase 2 != phase 3.
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
the weight curves are unusually steep, which makes predicting individual response harder
triple agonism is phase 2, do not generalise
Crossposting this to c/customs because the people who need it are not reading this community.
Three years on this site and the questions have not changed at all. Which is depressing or reassuring depending on the day.
This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.
- 1TRIUMPH phase 2 showed 99.3% weight loss but the nausea profile on the…5 comments in this branch · started by u/kavya_kravchenko