GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 51 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me — 48 comments in the full submission. View in context.
2.3k
c/retatrutide·submitted 2 years ago by u/discount_math_dm

week 51 check-in — 12kg down, injection-site soreness manageable, one thing confusing me

Discussionbranch of 8 comments

Been lurking in c/progresspics for about 24 months and finally have something worth posting. Short version: week 56, 1.7mg, and TRIUMPH is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 21 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle. What I actually want to know…

Read the full submission and all 48 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 2 years ago
u/kavya_kravchenko137 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Triple agonism is genuinely different.

replysharereportpermalink
u/careful_gradient3296 points·2 years ago

TRIUMPH data is phase 2, not phase 3, smaller n and shorter

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (6) →

← back to the whole thread

About c/retatrutide

Retatrutide: GIP/GLP-1/glucagon triple agonism, the TRIUMPH programme, and the fact that most people discussing it are handling research-grade material with no human-use approval anywhere. Dose-response, heart-rate signal, and the unusually steep phase-2 weight curves get argued about here weekly.

65kmembers
130submissions
Sep 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/retatrutide rules
  1. Retatrutide is not approved anywhere for human use. Posts must not read as usage instructions.
  2. Phase 2 numbers are not maintenance numbers. Cite the trial and the dose arm.
  3. Heart-rate and dose-escalation reports need actual measurements, not impressions.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.