GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of [Paper] ACHIEVE-1 glycaemic data vs the injectables — 23 comments in the full submission. View in context.
305
c/orforglipron·submitted 11 days ago by u/muscle_cramp_mo

[Paper] ACHIEVE-1 glycaemic data vs the injectables

Paperbranch of 4 comments

Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud. The advice on ATTAIN in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the…

Read the full submission and all 23 comments →

This branch

4 comments, started 9 days ago
u/trialwatch_theotrial nerd12 points·9 days ago·edited
good post. terrible flair.
replysharereportpermalink
u/kenji_laurent3 points·9 days ago

This is correct. ATTAIN data is phase 11.

replysharereportpermalink
[removed]1 point·9 days ago

[removed by moderator]

replysharereportpermalink
u/hazard_ratio_halstats1 point·9 days ago

That is net peptide content, not purity. Different number, different meaning.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/orforglipron

The small-molecule oral: why a non-peptide agonist escapes the absorption problems of oral semaglutide, what the ATTAIN and ACHIEVE readouts showed, and what a pill with no refrigeration requirement would do to the entire supply conversation this site is built around.

21kmembers
62submissions
Feb 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/orforglipron rules
  1. Small molecule, not a peptide. Purity discussion here is a different problem.
  2. Cite ATTAIN/ACHIEVE arms specifically when quoting numbers.
  3. Availability speculation must be flaired Speculation.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.