GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
5k
c/maintenancephase·posted 2 years ago by u/copay_card_cc

is it normal to get muscle cramps at week 84

Regain Cold Box ×8 Well Actually ×3 Receipts ×3

Confession thread, sort of.

I went from 2.5mg to 1.0mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 19 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.

So now I have constipation I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.

Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 93 reads it before doing the same thing.

19,203 up / 14,182 down58% upvoted55 commentsid 1rvbyi7 May 2024

55 comments

29 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/draw_up_dizzy860 points·2 years ago

the 7.5mg dose works fine for 57 weeks of the month

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_2026MOD516 points·2 years ago·edited

Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]197 points·2 years ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/cesar_oyelaran632 points·2 years ago

the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works

replysharereportpermalink
u/sena_balogun309 points·2 years ago

Disagree. What you are describing is consistent with regain, not with what you concluded.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rafael_krastev481 points·2 years ago·edited

Regain on a taper is expected. 4% back over 9 weeks, which matches the discontinuation data. Planned for it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/copay_card_cc-32 points·2 years ago

I am going to push back on this slightly.

replysharereportpermalink
u/noor_vermeulen1 point·2 years ago

the 0.5mg dose works fine for 93 weeks of the month

replysharereportpermalink
u/nadia_nascimento333 points·2 years ago

I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_asante229 points·2 years ago

The plateau is real and boring. 30 weeks at the same weight, then movement again. Patience was the intervention.

replysharereportpermalink
u/yara_antonsen74 points·2 years ago

the lowest dose you can stay on is not the lowest dose that works

replysharereportpermalink
u/laila_almeida108 points·2 years ago

the maintenance question changes at maintenance

replysharereportpermalink
u/copay_card_ccOP99 points·2 years ago

The plateau is real and boring. 62 weeks at the same weight, then movement again. Patience was the intervention.

replysharereportpermalink
u/crosspost_bot_no65 points·2 years ago·edited

dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/milos_vestergaard193 points·2 years ago

Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rohan_cardoso61 points·2 years ago·edited

nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part

replysharereportpermalink
u/nikhil_lindqvist45 points·2 years ago

nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part

Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.

replysharereportpermalink
u/copay_card_ccOP20 points·2 years ago

The plateau is real and boring. 51 weeks at the same weight, then movement again. Patience was the intervention.

replysharereportpermalink
u/sarcopenia_watch98 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.

replysharereportpermalink
u/erez_baptista40 points·2 years ago

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 24 is not maintenance

replysharereportpermalink
u/copay_card_ccOP32 points·2 years ago·edited

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 24 is not maintenance

Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_serrano85 points·2 years ago

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 4 is not maintenance

replysharereportpermalink
u/constipation_clubside effects63 points·2 years ago

regain after taper is expected, plan for it

replysharereportpermalink
u/still_here_202622 points·2 years ago

state how long you have been at maintenance, week 20 is not maintenance

replysharereportpermalink
u/paloma_stanescu6 points·2 years ago

dose-stretching experiences welcome, dose-stretching instructions are not

replysharereportpermalink
u/zeynep_mbeki49 points·2 years ago
^ this
replysharereportpermalink
u/teodor_duarte31 points·2 years ago

Tried the lowest-effective approach. 15mg worked for 7 weeks, then cravings returned. 10mg was the actual floor.

replysharereportpermalink
u/aleksi_eriksen16 points·2 years ago

This is correct. Weight variance is normal at maintenance.

replysharereportpermalink
u/salma_almeida10 points·2 years ago

nobody posts about this part and it is the longest part

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/maintenancephase

The part nobody posts about: what happens at goal weight. Finding a lowest effective dose, dose-interval stretching, regain risk data, muscle retention, the psychology of not having a number to chase, and staying on indefinitely versus tapering.

39kmembers
95submissions
Dec 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/maintenancephase rules
  1. State how long you have been at maintenance. "Maintenance" at week 30 is not maintenance.
  2. Regain is not a moral failing and posts implying it is get removed.
  3. Dose-stretching experiences welcome; dose-stretching instructions are not.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.