why does nobody talk about lowest effective dose
Quick one. Denmark here.
long term works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.
Specifics: the route I used took 17 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.
Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Mechanistically the bit that matters is goal weight. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
the maintenance question changes at maintenance
Weight variance within what range?
the 15mg dose works fine for 35 weeks of the month
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.
food noise returns but not always immediately
What dose are you on?
What dose are you on?
Adding to this: dose stretching is doing more work than the comment implies.
regain is not a moral failing
regain is not a moral failing
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
the plateau is where the learning happens
- 1Strongly agree. Lowest effective dose is a real discovery process.10 comments in this branch · started by u/vitamin_d_void
- 2the maintenance question changes at maintenance4 comments in this branch · started by u/noor_cardoso