GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
3k
c/labresults·posted 2 months ago by u/kenji_demir

what would you tell week-1 you about Janoshik

Lab Cold Box ×7 Slow Clap ×2 Well Actually ×3

Right, the test results question again, but with numbers this time.

I have 5 data points over 24 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign.

The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing showed up at week 28, not week 77. People give up long before the interesting part.

Interested in whether this matches other people's logs or whether I am an outlier.

11,604 up / 8,634 down57% upvoted19 commentsid qowp8d4 May 2026

19 comments

3 in this archive, depth 2

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/thandi_solberg602 points·2 months ago

Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.

replysharereportpermalink
u/rina_sobczak160 points·2 months ago

Which VendorInvestigate service and what method did they use?

replysharereportpermalink
u/fatima_wojcik325 points·2 months ago·edited

The Janoshik result at 99.1% was below the 99.2% claim. ERP retested at their cost and came back 99.1%. Logged as resolved.

replysharereportpermalink
About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.