GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me — 62 comments in the full submission. View in context.
3.9k
c/labresults·submitted 10 months ago by u/medutest_mel

week 76 check-in — 12kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me

Labbranch of 7 comments

Right, the Janoshik question again, but with numbers this time. I have 15 data points over 10 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 62 comments →

This branch

7 comments, started 10 months ago
u/marisol_moreau366 points·10 months ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/enzo_fonseca86 points·10 months ago

multiple batches from QYB show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/mateusz_mensah429 points·10 months ago

reship and retest is the honest way to handle a low result

replysharereportpermalink
u/aussie_pbs_watchAU294 points·10 months ago

multiple batches from GGPeps show a spread, that is the data

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_eriksen222 points·10 months ago

the VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter results differ by 6 points, both inside inter-lab variance

replysharereportpermalink
u/yannick_barros139 points·10 months ago

WXT / BPC / batch 14 / Medutest / 97.4% — that is the shape

replysharereportpermalink
u/camila_mensa283 points·10 months ago

inter-lab variance is real, 21 points is inside normal

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/labresults

A running record of independent test results people paid for themselves. Every post follows the same shape: vendor, product, batch, testing service, method, and the number. Good results and bad results are equally welcome and get equal scrutiny.

44kmembers
95submissions
Oct 2023created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

Sigma-Aldrich Standards

Certified reference materials for peptide identity and purity work.

sigmaaldrich.com
More in c/labresults
c/labresults rules
  1. Template required: vendor / product / batch / service / method / result. Freeform posts get removed with a template reply.
  2. Do not editorialise in the title. Put the number in the title and the opinion in the body.
  3. Sample of one. Say so.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Full rules and how they are enforced →
Moderators
u/janoshik_junkieu/medutest_melu/peptidemeter_patu/coa_janitor
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.

Full disclaimer →