[Question] PeptideMeter — what am I missing here
Right, the purity question again, but with numbers this time. I have 5 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am describing…
Is that 98.1% area or mass?
testing the vendor claim versus testing your actual vial are two different posts
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
do not editorialise in the title, put the number in the title and the opinion in the body
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
below-spec results get logged, not dismissed
Strongly agree. Below-spec results matter as much as good ones.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.