am I the only one who found fertility harder than the injections
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on perimenopause in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Strongly agree. Cycle changes are documented.
cycle changes are real and under-researched
that is the funniest sentence i have read on this site
Adding to this: fertility is doing more work than the comment implies.
the trials mostly studied men, perimenopause skipped
Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On low-volume draws that can be several units.
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
contraception interaction claims need citation
contraception interaction claims need citation
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
the contraception question is under-powered in trials
the cycle tracking data matters, keep it private
- 1Dead space in the needle hub holds a small but non-trivial volume. On…6 comments in this branch · started by u/wholesome_lurker
- 2that is the funniest sentence i have read on this site5 comments in this branch · started by u/honest_syringe