GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Single comment threadYou are looking at one branch of my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether contraception is why — 44 comments in the full submission. View in context.
797
c/glp1women·submitted 1 year ago by u/mateusz_achebe

my ferritin moved and I cannot work out whether contraception is why

Resultsbranch of 8 comments

Right, the fertility question again, but with numbers this time. I have 12 data points over 26 weeks. The pattern is consistent enough that I do not think it is chance, and boring enough that nobody is going to screenshot it, which is usually a good sign. The thing I would flag for anyone new: the effect I am…

Read the full submission and all 44 comments →

This branch

8 comments, started 1 year ago
u/wholesome_lurker25 points·1 year ago
appreciate you saying you do not know
replysharereportpermalink
u/ferran_mensah17 points·1 year ago

PCOS and insulin resistance

replysharereportpermalink
u/ewan_tulloch11 points·1 year ago

PCOS and insulin resistance

Disagree on that part. 98.1% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/dose_creep_dan10 points·1 year ago

Small correction: the trial was 5 weeks, not 29. Does not change your point but people will quote it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/blunt_coldbox_20245 points·1 year ago

pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice

replysharereportpermalink
u/honest_syringe7 points·1 year ago

pregnancy and trying-to-conceive get clinician pointer, not community advice

Adding to this: fertility is doing more work than the comment implies.

replysharereportpermalink
u/milan_wikstrom8 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

replysharereportpermalink
u/cold_chromatogram4 points·1 year ago

Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.

Disagree on that part. 96.2% and 96.8% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink

← back to the whole thread

About c/glp1women

The questions the trials under-powered: PCOS and insulin resistance, cycle changes, fertility signal and contraception interactions, perimenopause and menopause weight physiology, and the fact that the pregnancy answer is always "not while trying, talk to your clinician".

48kmembers
62submissions
Jul 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/glp1women rules
  1. Pregnancy and trying-to-conceive questions get a clinician pointer, not community advice.
  2. Contraception interaction claims need a citation.
  3. No cycle-tracking data with identifying details.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.