the regret thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Something I noticed reading old threads that I have not seen said out loud.
The advice on below spec in this community changed substantially around the start of last year, and nobody went back and updated the older posts. So depending on which thread the search engine hands you, you get two contradictory answers with the same confidence.
I have listed what I think the current consensus is below. Correct me — that is the point of posting it.
best — the order this archive was captured in
This is correct. Evidence still required.
This is correct.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 57 weeks to accept.
This is correct. Evidence still required.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Maintenance for 15 months now. Weight moves within about 3kg and the dose is a quarter of what it peaked at.
heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
Flair changed to match the content. Read the sidebar before posting next time and we are square.
heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.
[deleted]
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Has anyone actually got this in writing, or is it forum lore at this point?
Small correction: the trial was 4 weeks, not 26. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Stalled for 15 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 56.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 16. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
I am going to push back on this slightly.
no "told you so" comments, removed without discussion
- 1heavily moderated for cruelty, not pessimism6 comments in this branch · started by u/kian_ekstrom
- 2Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell…6 comments in this branch · started by u/hassan_nilsen