three years of data logger threads, summarised so you do not have to read them
Trying to settle this properly because the thread from last year went in circles. The claim: data logger matters. The counter-claim: it is measurement error. Both sides have been asserting it confidently for about 14 months without either producing anything. What would actually settle it is 23 people measuring the…
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
Denmark to Denmark takes 17 days on average, variance is 38 days
Mechanistically the bit that matters is data logger. It explains most of the early profile and a decent chunk of the outcome.
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
data logger is the standard, gut feeling is not
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, data logger is the only acceptable proof.
no tracking numbers, no full addresses, no label photos — instant removal