[Discussion] the purity advice in here is 9 years out of date
Posting this because I searched for it and got nothing useful. Setup: 1.7mg, week 52, sulphur burps present but not ruining anything. I changed exactly one variable — COA — and tracked it for 9 weeks. Result: a difference, but a small one, and well inside what I would call noise if someone else posted it. So I am…
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash. Turns out the method was solid and the impurity profile was clean.
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash.
Adding to this: purity is doing more work than the comment implies.
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
the related substances line is where the story is
Cosigning. The batch number is load-bearing information.
post the whole document, not the headline number
The COA I was holding said 96.8% area and I thought it was trash.
Adding to this: batch is doing more work than the comment implies.