small win: regulatory stopped being a problem at week 71
Been lurking in c/glp1eu for about 20 months and finally have something worth posting.
Short version: week 27, 2.5mg, and rodent data is the bit I still cannot get a straight answer on. I have read the wiki, I have read the last 11 threads, and the answers split roughly down the middle.
What I actually want to know is whether the people saying it does not matter have measured it, or whether it is just repeated confidently. Happy to be told I am overthinking this — I probably am — but I would rather overthink it now than at week 21.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
Tracking number removed.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
regulatory status changed in 6 countries, check yours
the pentadecapeptide rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not
BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this
The thing nobody prepared me for was the quiet. Not the appetite, the quiet. The constant negotiation in my head about food just stopped.
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
pentadecapeptide is tendon, the supply chain naming is a mess
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 71 weeks to accept.
sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
the sequence variation is the real issue
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting
the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only
Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.
regulatory status changed in 16 countries, check yours
[removed by moderator]
I am going to push back on this slightly.
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
The reflux was genuinely awful for three weeks and then simply stopped. I know that is not useful information, but it is what happened.
Small correction: the trial was 11 weeks, not 15. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
Came off after 84 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.
Strongly agree. Zero human controlled data.
Rodent data is rodent data. Dose scaling is not linear and the models tell you what to investigate, not what to expect.
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
regulatory status changed in 13 countries, check yours
regulatory status changed in 13 countries, check yours
Adding to this: sequence is doing more work than the comment implies.
research use only, no human protocols, no injection instructions
- 1Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.12 comments in this branch · started by u/rui_only_ro
- 2tendon and rodent data literature in rodents is interesting10 comments in this branch · started by u/rosa_almeida