GLPHubglpresearchhub.com
Read-only archive. GLP Research Hub is a static community record — nothing here is for sale, no account is needed, and no vote you cast is counted. Why?
Archived. This submission is more than a year old. Votes and new comments are closed, and some of the advice in it may have been superseded — check the community wiki for the current version.
1.1k
c/bpc157·posted 1 year ago by u/isabela_nilsen

my ALT moved and I cannot work out whether BPC-157 is why

Sceptic Clean Column ×6 Sourced ×2

Quick one. Canada here.

tendon works very differently where I live than in the threads that dominate the front page, and I keep seeing people confidently given advice that simply does not apply outside the US.

Specifics: the route I used took 22 weeks and cost roughly what I expected. The admin was worse than the cost. The thing that would have saved me the most time was knowing which document to ask for at the start.

Happy to answer questions from anyone in the same jurisdiction.

1,271 up / 138 down90% upvoted39 commentsid yfsub317 Jul 2025

39 comments

27 in this archive, depth 4

best — the order this archive was captured in

u/enzo_ferrari85 points·1 year ago

Genuine question — what concentration were you at?

replysharereportpermalink
u/sequence_checkerMOD69 points·1 year ago

Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain56 points·1 year ago·edited

Tracking number removed.

Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 39 weeks to accept.

replysharereportpermalink
u/marta_trevino61 points·1 year ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
[deleted]45 points·1 year ago

[deleted]

replysharereportpermalink
u/clara_danquah-17 points·1 year ago

near-zero controlled human data, full stop

replysharereportpermalink
load more comments (1) →
u/asks_dumb_questions37 points·1 year ago

the regulatory rodent evidence is solid, human evidence is not

replysharereportpermalink
u/endotoxin_elliemicro8 points·1 year ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post6 points·1 year ago

Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.

replysharereportpermalink
u/elodie_yilmaz20 points·1 year ago

rodent data must be labelled as rodent data

replysharereportpermalink
u/ms_fragmenter16 points·1 year ago

Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.

replysharereportpermalink
u/runa_cabrera7 points·1 year ago

the BPC-157 literature looks promising but rodent-only

replysharereportpermalink
u/mei_serrano12 points·1 year ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink
u/canada_coverage14 points·1 year ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

Disagree on that part. 99.2% and 99.3% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post7 points·1 year ago

Yeah, rodent data does not scale to humans.

replysharereportpermalink
u/search_before_post21 points·1 year ago

Water content matters more than people think. If a vial is carrying residual moisture, your "10mg" is not 10mg of peptide.

replysharereportpermalink
u/kavya_verhoeven10 points·1 year ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/incretin_ivypharmacology14 points·1 year ago

BPC pentadecapeptide is a naming problem, three things are called this

Disagree on that part. 97.9% and 97.6% on the same vial is normal.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mariam_cabrera6 points·1 year ago

Ireland here. Waited 23 months on a list, gave up, went private, and the total cost was roughly what I expected.

replysharereportpermalink
u/mod_cold_roommod · c/coldchain3 points·1 year ago

BPC regulatory is a naming problem, three things are called this

replysharereportpermalink
u/gas_fee_grump2 points·1 year ago

pentadecapeptide is sequence, the supply chain naming is a mess

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsenOP3 points·1 year ago

Came off after 2 weeks for financial reasons. Regained about a third over the following year. Back on now at a much lower dose.

replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu7 points·1 year ago·edited
four days. it took four days for me.
replysharereportpermalink
u/ismael_chukwu6 points·1 year ago

handlers in the community are rare and cautious

replysharereportpermalink
u/rosa_almeida5 points·1 year ago·edited

Not to be pedantic but regulatory and tendon are being used interchangeably and they are not interchangeable in real life.

replysharereportpermalink
u/isabela_nilsenOP2 points·1 year ago

Stalled for 20 weeks, changed nothing, and it started moving again on week 11.

replysharereportpermalink
Permalinked branches
Deep branches get their own page so a single reply chain can be linked and read on its own.
About c/bpc157

BPC-157 as it actually is: a pentadecapeptide with a genuinely interesting rodent tendon-and-gut literature, near-zero controlled human data, a naming and sequence mess in the supply chain, and a regulatory status that changed sharply in several countries.

35kmembers
62submissions
Mar 2024created
submissions / month, last year
Sponsored

PeptideMeter Analytics

Independent testing plus vendor-level trend data. Community-funded, unaffiliated.

peptidemeter.com
c/bpc157 rules
  1. Research use only. No human protocols, no injection instructions.
  2. Rodent data must be labelled as rodent data in the body.
  3. Sequence and naming claims need the actual sequence.
  4. Independent community. Nobody here sells anything, and anyone who tries is banned.
  5. Not medical advice. Describe what you did; never prescribe to a stranger.
  6. Claims need evidence. Batch numbers, dated screenshots, independent test reports, or a citation.
  7. No referral links, discount codes or affiliate URLs. Permanent ban, no appeal.
  8. No contact handles, wallet addresses or tracking numbers — they identify people.
  9. Be recognisably decent. Disagree hard, insult nobody.
Moderators
Volunteers. Unpaid, unaffiliated, and reachable through modmail only.
Before you read on

Several compounds discussed on GLP Research Hub are sold for research use only and are not approved for human use anywhere. Nothing here is medical advice and none of it is written by your clinician. If a post reads like an instruction, treat it as a description of what one stranger did.