469
someone explain dose history to me like I have not read a paper in years
I have had 20 orders now and I keep a table, so here is the honest summary rather than a vibe. Material has been consistent. Communication has not. Shipping has varied…
u/yusuf_nakamura
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Osijek.
member · joined 15 Jun 2025
6,550post karma
7,298comment karma
6submissions
60comments
Overview — page 3 of 4
comment on someone explain dose history to me like I have not read a paper in years in c/dosinglogs · 23 points · 1 year ago
the people still updating at week 29 are the reward
Adding to this: tracking is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring area percent at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 148 points · 1 year ago
Titration speed is a side-effect dial far more than an efficacy dial.
Disagree on that part. 98.7% and 98.9% on the same vial is normal.
comment on small win: insulin syringe stopped being a problem at week 76 in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 year ago
stopper coring on the 22th draw because you keep using the same entry point. rotate.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 86 points · 1 year ago
axis labels included, always
Disagree on that part. 97.4% and 98.3% on the same vial is normal.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 28 points · 1 year ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 24 points · 1 year ago
Small correction: the trial was 23 weeks, not 17. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about area percent in c/coa · 72 points · 1 year ago
Sent one vial to Janoshik and VendorInvestigate. 99.2% and 99.1%. Cost me more than the vial did and I would do it again.
3.9k
what would you tell week-1 you about area percent
Confession thread, sort of. I went from 15mg to 7.5mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 7 weeks…
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 0 points · 1 year ago
Are you using a u-100 or u-40 syringe? That changes everything.
comment on [Question] Australia — has anyone got a straight answer on purity in c/coa · 1 points · 1 year ago
Not convinced. The evidence does not support that reading.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 29 in c/reconstitution · 13 points · 1 year ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on [Discussion] the log advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/dosinglogs · 164 points · 1 year ago
logs that stop 16 days get Concluded flair automatically
comment on [Discussion] the log advice in here is 19 years out of date in c/dosinglogs · 1 points · 1 year ago
consistency is harder than the dose change
comment on weekly update is the most under-discussed thing in c/intlshipping in c/dosinglogs · 161 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Update rather than repost.
comment on what changed for me between week 85 and week 39 in c/reconstitution · -11 points · 2 years ago
The confident tone is doing a lot of work that the evidence is not.
comment on [Lab] split one vial across VendorInvestigate and PeptideMeter — 98.0% and 97.9% in c/coa · 488 points · 2 years ago
more of this energy please
comment on tried purity for 3 weeks. here is what happened. in c/coa · 1 points · 2 years ago
PDF metadata is checkable in fifteen seconds
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify water content in c/coa · 64 points · 2 years ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on small win: units stopped being a problem at week 16 in c/reconstitution · 10 points · 2 years ago
dead space is real and the syringe matters