u/receipts_or_nothing
Screenshot, date, order id, or it did not happen.
long-standing contributor · vetting · joined 30 Jan 2024
Comments — page 3 of 4
comment on the order records thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down in c/vendorvetting · 0 points · 1 year ago
GGPeps order #2, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
comment on 18 months in and hazard ratio is still the thing I get wrong in c/trialwatch · -1 points · 1 year ago
Is that absolute or relative risk reduction?
comment on [Lab] SSA tirz — Medutest came back 97.4% against a claimed 98.3% in c/vendorvetting · 671 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about hazard ratio in c/trialwatch · 3 points · 1 year ago
off-label use data is different from approved-indication data
comment on [Lab] 4th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/trialwatch · 16 points · 1 year ago
number-needed-to-treat is the house dialect
comment on [Question] how do you actually verify Medutest in c/vendorvetting · 66 points · 1 year ago
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Adding to this: order records is doing more work than the comment implies.
comment on anyone else notice SURPASS kicking in around week 19 in c/trialwatch · 48 points · 1 year ago
I love that this community will spend 40 comments on a detail. That pedantry is why the numbers here matter.
comment on Janoshik vs order records — genuinely asking which matters more in c/vendorvetting · 17 points · 1 year ago
Retitled to remove editorialising. Put the evidence in the body.
comment on [Results] 6 weeks on 12.5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/vendorvetting · 173 points · 1 year ago
Tracking number removed. It identifies both ends of a shipment.
comment on [Discussion] VendorInvestigate is doing more work than we give it credit for in c/vendorvetting · 2 points · 1 year ago
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
comment on unpopular opinion: Janoshik is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 189 points · 1 year ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on unpopular opinion: Janoshik is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 59 points · 1 year ago
GL Biochem three times. First two perfect, third arrived with a gel pack failure. Powder tested 97.4% anyway, so no harm done.
comment on genuine question about VendorInvestigate that I am slightly embarrassed to ask in c/vendorvetting · 246 points · 2 years ago
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for STEP posts in c/trialwatch · 75 points · 2 years ago
Mechanistically the bit that matters is SELECT.
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 52 weeks to accept.
comment on unpopular opinion: reship is massively overrated in c/vendorvetting · 18 points · 2 years ago
How many orders from GL Biochem is that a sample of? One reship is noise, five is a pattern.
comment on Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 1 points · 2 years ago
referral links mean instant ban, no exceptions
comment on Medutest — 17 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/vendorvetting · 689 points · 2 years ago
comment on week 66 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 414 points · 2 years ago
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
comment on week 66 check-in — 26kg down, fatigue manageable, one thing confusing me in c/vendorvetting · 422 points · 2 years ago
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 39. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
comment on [Vendor] QST order #11 — Denmark, 7 days, no drama, receipts inside in c/vendorvetting · 33 points · 2 years ago
This is an urgent-care question wearing a forum question's clothes. Please contact a clinician rather than waiting for replies.