the order records thing finally clicked for me and I want to write it down
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 9 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have constipation I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 44 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
order date, product, and what was tested. that is the template.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Cosigning the evidence standard.
Counter-anecdote: opposite result, same dose. Which mostly tells us the variance is huge.
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Is that a Medutest result or are you quoting the vendor COA?
Removed a chain here. The rule is one line long and it is not negotiable.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
one vendor per post, multi-vendor goes in the monthly thread
Correct. The batch number is load-bearing information, not optional.
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
GGPeps order #2, Ireland, no drama, receipts inside
Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.
Small correction: the trial was 21 weeks, not 39. Does not change your point but people will quote it.
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
vendor staff must self-identify, full stop
Adding to this: VendorInvestigate is doing more work than the comment implies.
the PeptideMeter result being close to the claim is the signal, not the absolute number
did they reship, credit, or ghost you?
- 1Cosigning the evidence standard. Receipts make the community.8 comments in this branch · started by u/elin_ferrari
- 2The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a…4 comments in this branch · started by u/aleksi_lehtinen