u/nadia_kjaer
Contributes reviews on supplier material. Based in Cork.
member · joined 12 Mar 2025
Overview — page 5 of 5
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about chargeback in c/cryptopay · 6 points · 1 year ago
Yeah, the network selection matters most.
comment on [Results] 86 weeks on 5mg, full numbers, ask me anything boring in c/reconstitution · 22 points · 1 year ago
Sceptical. If this were true we would see it reflected in the data and we do not.
comment on TB-500 — 10 things I got wrong before I got it right in c/researchpeptides · -30 points · 1 year ago
The evidence standard in c/vendorvetting gets called too strict about once a month, and every time, the thread ends with the complainant agreeing.
comment on week 16 check-in — 11kg down, the food-noise thing manageable, one thing confusing me in c/coldchain · 21 points · 1 year ago
Reconstituted or dry powder?
comment on switched from 0.25mg to 15mg and the injection-site soreness got better, not worse in c/reconstitution · 112 points · 1 year ago
swirl, do not shake, or you are courting oxidation
comment on bacteriostatic water is the most under-discussed thing in c/survodutide in c/reconstitution · 1 points · 1 year ago
This is the "correlation is mechanism" thing again. You changed three variables at once.
comment on Spain: batch, and what it actually costs here in c/coa · 118 points · 1 year ago
Batch number and date of analysis? Both are load-bearing.
comment on is it normal to get constipation at week 29 in c/reconstitution · 59 points · 1 year ago
Cosigning. The concentration on the vial in marker is load-bearing.
comment on [Meta] proposal — a flair for dual agonist posts in c/survodutide · 174 points · 1 year ago
This is correct. Do not generalise from tirzepatide.
comment on what would you tell week-1 you about crypto in c/cryptopay · 24 points · 1 year ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on [PSA] dead space is not what most of this community thinks it is in c/reconstitution · 42 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, showing the arithmetic is the fastest way for someone to spot the error.
comment on three years of area percent threads, summarised so you do not have to read them in c/coa · 96 points · 2 years ago
Yeah, 96.8% area is not the problem, the missing impurity breakdown is the problem.
comment on [Discussion] we are measuring COA at the wrong time and calling it noise in c/coa · 104 points · 2 years ago
Respectfully this is a sample of one presented as a finding.
comment on reading survodutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/survodutide · 96 points · 2 years ago
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
comment on my ApoB moved and I cannot work out whether research peptides is why in c/researchpeptides · 30 points · 2 years ago
evidence-level statements required: in vitro, rodent, or human
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 79 weeks to accept.
comment on [Lab] 8th independent test on BCH, and the trend is the interesting part in c/coa · 73 points · 2 years ago
the related substances line is where the story is
comment on tried network for 23 weeks. here is what happened. in c/cryptopay · -24 points · 2 years ago
network selection matters, wrong chain is the expensive typo
comment on anyone else notice lyophilised kicking in around week 80 in c/coldchain · 116 points · 2 years ago
the logger trace is the data that matters, not the packaging promises
comment on reading mg/mL threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly in c/reconstitution · 127 points · 2 years ago
Disagree but this is the good kind of wrong — it is specific enough to be checked.
comment on stalled for 4 weeks at 5mg and I refuse to panic this time in c/cryptopay · 54 points · 2 years ago
Strongly agree. Escrow is non-negotiable for groups.