reading survodutide threads from 2024 and half of it aged badly
Confession thread, sort of.
I went from 1.7mg to 0.25mg much faster than I should have because the scale had stalled and I got impatient. The stall broke about 18 weeks later, at which point I had no way of knowing whether the dose increase did anything or whether it would have broken anyway.
So now I have sulphur burps I did not need and a data point I cannot interpret. Two lessons in one.
Posting it in the hope that somebody at week 26 reads it before doing the same thing.
best — the order this archive was captured in
Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different column, different gradient, different integration.
glucagon co-agonism has a different safety story
Week 26 for me and the honest summary is: 14kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Week 26 for me and the honest summary is: 14kg down, reflux manageable, and I have thought about food maybe four times today.
Disagree on that part. 95.1% and 95.1% on the same vial is normal.
Edit to your parent would help — the concentration you quoted assumes one scenario and you have written another above it.
rodent survodutide is investigation only
this is the third time this week and i love it every time
Yes, exactly this, and it is the bit that took me 65 weeks to accept.
phase 12 data is interesting, phase 34 will be different
- 1Inter-lab variance on this kind of assay is routinely 1–2 points. Different…7 comments in this branch · started by u/nadia_kjaer